Perspective-taking Essay

derriere, 12 long clip old, sits anxiously on his desk, waiting for Ms apprehension to hand him the result of his maths riddle. With hands in fervent prayer, he closes his eyes as Ms Terror lays the test paper on his table. A big red F screams to him the here and now he opened his eyes. He has anticipate that grade because instead of check overing for the test, he played pop the night playing internet games with Aaron. His predicament how eject he get a healthy grade in abutting Fridays exam when Aaron is inviting him to play again? According to Magnus Linklater (2007), mates groups are a childs biggest influencers.This is undeniable as children believe their peers are the only ones who washbowl understand them. simply adults should not devaluate their problem solving abilities as they pass on a unique way of get things done and answering their personal needs. facial expression into Piagets cognitive development, we befool that bum has just entered the formal operational full point, wherein he develops the ability to think about raise concepts and discovers skills such as logical thought, deductive reasoning, and systematic computer programmening (Van Wagner, 2007).With logic, derriere chooses to field of force not only for his coming math test but also for completely his other tests and sets aside internet games until weekend. He bangs that doing so, he will get more than than just a passing grade, and hence no more terror looks from Ms Terror as headspring as unsolicited talks with Mom and Dad. Moreover, cerebration abstractly, instead of relying on past experiences, antic considers the possible consequences of agreeing to Aarons invitation. He would be reprimanded by Ms Terror or worse, she would call the attention of his parents.In addition, posterior chooses not to rely on trial-and-error methods of doing things, as he did when he was junior or in earlier stages of Piagets cognitive development (Van Wagner, 2007). He now has the ability to solve his predicament in a systematic manner, thus he quickly comes up with a plan for him not to get another dreaded F. He reads his lessons few days forwards the test so he stinker play games with Aaron in his free time or review his lesson the night onwards the test and just play on weekends, whichever way he is comfortable with.But derrieres interaction with his peers, Aaron in particular, should not be discouraged, as Piaget pointed out that a childs peer interaction is not just a major source of his or her cognitive development but his or her brotherly development as well, specifically in role-taking and empathy (cited in Oden, 1987). John regards Aaron as his topper friend, thus sustaining their friendship allows John to know his own self and his range of affectionate interaction skills. Furthermore, since the two boys have passed the stage wherein they share just physical activities desire childhood games, and they are now fitted of sharing materials, being kind or helpful (Oden, 1987), and perceiving their friendship as funding individuality and mutuality, John either invites Aaron to review their lessons together before playing games or asks Aaron to postpone their leisure activity until the test is done so that each ignore review on his own and in conclusion perform better in the test.The surmise of moral development by psychologist Kohlberg, who force inspiration from Piagets cognitive development, can also help answer Johns dilemma. John takes into consideration the expectations of his family, as he tries to maintain, support, and justify that studying seriously for the test is the right thing to do, in accordance to the conventional level of Kohlbergs theory. Specifically, he resorts to being a steady-going boy by reviewing for the test because he knows that doing so will please Ms Terror and Mom and Dad.Johns behavior is judged by his intention, which is both good and important since he means well (Kohlb erg, 1971) for himself, for Ms Terror, for Mom and Dad, and even for fellowship at large. John could solve his dilemma in various perspectives, which directly or indirectly take its root from Piagets cognitive theory. This only shows that students like John can solve their own dilemmas in their own respective ways. It is normal for them to hesitate and make mistakes because through these, they get to learn, grow, and develop. Now, John sits comfortably on his desk, excited to see his grade on the math test. B it reads.